Humm Group Limited – Costs Orders
The Panel has made costs orders (Annexure A) requiring Humm Group Limited (Humm) to pay a portion of the fair and reasonable costs incurred by Mr Raper in connection with these proceedings, as detailed below.
The Panel has made costs orders (Annexure A) requiring Humm Group Limited (Humm) to pay a portion of the fair and reasonable costs incurred by Mr Raper in connection with these proceedings, as detailed below.
The Panel has received an application from Quinbrook Asset Management Pty Ltd as trustee for the Critical Resources Strategy seeking a review of the Panel’s decision in Kingsland Minerals Ltd (see TP26/035).
The President of the Panel has consented to the application for review under section 657EA(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
A review Panel has not been appointed at this stage and no decision has been made whether to conduct proceedings. The Panel makes no comment on the merits of the application.
The Panel notes the announcement by Humm Group Limited (Humm) on 15 June 2026 stating that the Panel had decided not to consent to a request from Humm Group Limited (Humm) to vary the undertaking provided by Humm to the Panel on 26 February 2026 (Undertaking – see TP26/09). The request to vary the Undertaking was to replace Ms Teresa Dyson with Mr Rajeev Dhawan as Chair of the independent board committee of Humm (IBC).
The Panel has declined to conduct proceedings on an application dated 4 June 2026 from Quinbrook Asset Management Pty Ltd as trustee for the Critical Resources Strategy in relation to the affairs of Kingsland Minerals Ltd (Kingsland).
The Panel has received an application from Quinbrook Asset Management Pty Ltd as trustee for the Critical Resources Strategy in relation to the affairs of Kingsland Minerals Ltd. The application concerns an alleged association between certain shareholders and officers of Kingsland Minerals.
Details of the application, as submitted by the applicant, are below.
A sitting Panel has not been appointed at this stage and no decision has been made whether to conduct proceedings. The Panel makes no comment on the merits of the application.